tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post5093590761401186010..comments2023-05-05T06:38:34.592-04:00Comments on IMHO: Remember my "Republicans are Scum" post?Niceguy Eddiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03896896323840121445noreply@blogger.comBlogger137125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-69328147333172238712013-05-12T20:46:18.585-04:002013-05-12T20:46:18.585-04:00"... So, I didn't actually say posting he..."... So, I didn't actually say posting here was illegal, then did I? I said the method you use could be."<br /><br />You said more than that, because when it was pointed out that I was posting from an MWR, you continued to say I was stealing from the government. So, are you now admitting you were wrong, that you had no basis whatsoever to make the accusations you did? I'm not sure why else the word "could" is now in your claim.<br /><br />" ... It's difficult dealing with liars, like you, so I needed to tread lightly while I watch you flounder with each of my statements."<br /><br />So you talked out of your ass to accomplish some means that you can't exactly explain. Of course, that's very believable. Note the sarcasm.<br /><br />And you've still never demonstrated a lie on my part. You love to say it, but proving it seems way beyond your grasp.Brabantiohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02183512606468901460noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-984448099053784422013-05-12T13:45:45.098-04:002013-05-12T13:45:45.098-04:00"When you replied to my comment about the com..."When you replied to my comment about the computer I was using (to post here) with an accusation of "illegal" activity." ... So, I didn't actually say posting here was illegal, then did I? I said the method you use could be. You must be a 20 watter.<br /><br />"Funny, you haven't had any problem telling me where I live up until now. Why the change?" ... It's difficult dealing with liars, like you, so I needed to tread lightly while I watch you flounder with each of my statements. Now that I've proven you lie like a whore on Bourbon street, it doesn't really matter. I don't expect anything from you expect further lies. Once a liar always a liar. I wonder how much credibility you have left at this site after the way I corralled you into lie after lie. <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-40273555709667422422013-05-12T12:52:42.943-04:002013-05-12T12:52:42.943-04:00"... When have I said that posting here is il..."... When have I said that posting here is illegal?"<br /><br />When you replied to my comment about the computer I was using (to post here) with an accusation of "illegal" activity. And you just explained that comment by talking about me posting here ("Eddie gets paid when you post here").<br /><br />So, if you're not talking about me posting here in the context of your charges of UCMJ violations, then what the hell are you talking about?<br /><br />"Which base are you at again, I'll call them."<br /><br />Funny, you haven't had any problem telling <i>me</i> where I live up until now. Why the change?Brabantiohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02183512606468901460noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-27373068914982602152013-05-12T11:47:26.667-04:002013-05-12T11:47:26.667-04:00"How is that "illegal", again?"..."How is that "illegal", again?" ... When have I said that posting here is illegal? Does the Army know about your paranoid delusions? Perhaps they should. Which base are you at again, I'll call them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-14298374660437257142013-05-12T11:18:36.531-04:002013-05-12T11:18:36.531-04:00So, here's what you said before:"Otherwis...So, here's what you said before:"Otherwise, there is NOTHING that says I am referring to you 'posting' on this site as a crime."<br /><br />And:"I never said "payment" needed to be involved."<br /><br />And now:"Eddie gets paid when you post here."<br /><br />Also earlier, from me:"I eagerly await your semantic contortions to explain how you were talking about something other than posting on this site."<br /><br />So now, you are talking about me posting on this site, not a "job" that I happen to have. How is that "illegal", again?Brabantiohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02183512606468901460noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-60068770025985451032013-05-12T10:52:31.297-04:002013-05-12T10:52:31.297-04:00Eddie gets paid when you post here. It is a busine...Eddie gets paid when you post here. It is a business. Eddie gets paid when he posts here. That means posting at this site is a business (in this situation). Some blog sites don't have so many commercial advertisements. This one does. It is a business. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-61020366616744245412013-05-12T10:44:11.635-04:002013-05-12T10:44:11.635-04:00No, moron, the question involved your claim that y...No, moron, the question involved your claim that you didn't say payment had to be involved. Here, I'll help you out:<br /><br />You:"I never said "payment" needed to be involved."<br /><br />Me:"You didn't?:"Because "posting" would be personal USE, unless you are getting paid for doing this." Now you're down to distinguishing between "payment" and "paid"?"<br /><br />You:"... Are you using my 'hypothetical' as an 'absolute'?"<br /><br />So, your citation of posts you made before that exchange makes no sense. What the hell is your "hypothetical" supposed to be, exactly?Brabantiohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02183512606468901460noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-2403148049999839182013-05-12T10:23:44.924-04:002013-05-12T10:23:44.924-04:00"Show me where." ... Here, then there. S..."Show me where." ... Here, then there. Since that seems to be all you have left, I will take that as you submitting to my superior intellect and giving up.<br /><br />http://eddiecabot.blogspot.com/2013/03/remember-my-republicans-are-scum-post.html?showComment=1367155816711#c740724297494560110<br /><br />http://eddiecabot.blogspot.com/2013/03/remember-my-republicans-are-scum-post.html?showComment=1367234420096#c4109848944110428050Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-83325116395292645612013-05-11T00:28:02.933-04:002013-05-11T00:28:02.933-04:00Really? You answered this?:"How is that a hy...Really? You answered this?:"How is that a hypothetical when you're talking about me posting here?"<br /><br />Show me where.Brabantiohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02183512606468901460noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-1529950436357298072013-05-10T23:48:40.961-04:002013-05-10T23:48:40.961-04:00Brother, I've defended them time and time agai...Brother, I've defended them time and time again. Get a clue, for God's sake.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-74059906649660845482013-05-04T22:03:54.314-04:002013-05-04T22:03:54.314-04:00In other words, you can't defend your own word...In other words, you can't defend your own words.<br /><br />Got it.Brabantiohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02183512606468901460noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-49309469869024719992013-05-04T07:21:54.811-04:002013-05-04T07:21:54.811-04:00If you can't read what is written, then you ar...If you can't read what is written, then you are too dumb to explain it to. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-22101564757565524182013-05-03T11:30:16.803-04:002013-05-03T11:30:16.803-04:00I read what you wrote. Answer the question.I read what you wrote. Answer the question.Brabantiohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02183512606468901460noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-116603799638946922013-05-03T08:12:02.710-04:002013-05-03T08:12:02.710-04:00"How is that a hypothetical when you're t..."How is that a hypothetical when you're talking about me posting here?" ... Look, would you sign up for that damn class and stop asking stupid questions? Get your head out of your ass and read the statement, doofus.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-47724363900935913652013-05-02T05:56:25.093-04:002013-05-02T05:56:25.093-04:00"... Are you using my 'hypothetical' ..."... Are you using my 'hypothetical' as an 'absolute'?"<br /><br />How is that a hypothetical when you're talking about me posting here? Are you talking about the <i>possibility</i> of me posting on this site, while you respond to my posts?Brabantiohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02183512606468901460noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-34655804314917008752013-05-01T07:42:04.199-04:002013-05-01T07:42:04.199-04:00"You didn't?" ... Are you using my ..."You didn't?" ... Are you using my 'hypothetical' as an 'absolute'? Reading Comp 101 is still taking sign-ups. Hurry, you really need it.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-73300540652185974012013-04-30T22:20:06.243-04:002013-04-30T22:20:06.243-04:00"I never said "payment" needed to b..."I never said "payment" needed to be involved."<br /><br />You didn't?:"Because "posting" would be personal USE, unless you are getting paid for doing this." Now you're down to distinguishing between "payment" and "paid"? By all means, explain the difference between them. Talking about verbs and nouns isn't going to cut it, in case that's your plan.<br /><br />"You're not so good at actually addressing the point."<br /><br />So using the word "payment" instead of "paid" is somehow dodging the point, yet you failed conspicuously to address this:"What "business" did you think I was running when you said it?" Remember, you said it meant "a job". What "job" did you think I was acting under when you wrote "personal business"?Brabantiohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02183512606468901460noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-16583975956204684162013-04-30T07:35:52.328-04:002013-04-30T07:35:52.328-04:00I never said "payment" needed to be invo...I never said "payment" needed to be involved. Changing the parameters again? You're good at doing that. You're not so good at actually addressing the point. Have you signed up for Reading Comp 101, yet?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-50612222176049788712013-04-29T10:55:04.973-04:002013-04-29T10:55:04.973-04:00"... Yes it does."
No, it doesn't. ..."... Yes it does."<br /><br />No, it doesn't. For instance, "raising my kids is my personal business". That doesn't mean there's payment involved. Besides, you're the one who used the phrase. If you think it means some financial enterprise, why did you use the phrase regarding my activity? What "business" did you think I was running when you said it?Brabantiohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02183512606468901460noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-41098489441104280502013-04-29T07:20:20.096-04:002013-04-29T07:20:20.096-04:00"The phrase "personal business" doe..."The phrase "personal business" doesn't mean a job, jackass." ... Yes it does. Reading comprehension 101, you should consider taking that class.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-47067638890937861702013-04-28T23:24:45.205-04:002013-04-28T23:24:45.205-04:00"... If this blog site is YOUR personal busin..."... If this blog site is YOUR personal business operation, then you got me."<br /><br />Funny, I don't remember you using the word "operation" before.<br /><br />"Because I (obviously) said "personal business". What "business" are you performing while posting?"<br /><br />The phrase "personal business" doesn't mean a job, jackass. Here's an even better question back to you:What the hell did you mean when <i>you</i> used the phrase? Be specific.<br /><br />"I didn't think you were able to distinguish "personal BUSINESS" from "personal USE". Did you find the link where I said "personal USE"? Because "posting" would be personal USE, unless you are getting paid for doing this."<br /><br />No, the phrase "personal business" isn't restricted to anything regarding money. You are woefully misinformed or making lame excuses for your behavior. I'm guessing the latter.<br /><br />"You said it was sparsely populated site, but you never said anything about "meaning few posters"."<br /><br />Wrong. I used the word "posters" myself. Hence, "sparsely-populated" would be relevant to that term. The word, again, is "context".Brabantiohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02183512606468901460noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-7407242974945601102013-04-28T09:30:16.711-04:002013-04-28T09:30:16.711-04:00"You shouldn't be using government equipm..."You shouldn't be using government equipment to do personal business then." ... If this blog site is YOUR personal business operation, then you got me. Otherwise, there is NOTHING that says I am referring to you 'posting' on this site as a crime. Because I (obviously) said "personal business". What "business" are you performing while posting? <br />You see, you are not very smart, so I knew what you were going to be whining about. That's why I asked for proof. I didn't think you were able to distinguish "personal BUSINESS" from "personal USE". Did you find the link where I said "personal USE"? Because "posting" would be personal USE, unless you are getting paid for doing this.<br /><br />"I said it was a sparsely-populated site. Meaning few posters." ... Just like the above comment, you really need to learn how to read and comprehend. You should SAY what you MEAN and MEAN what you say. You said it was sparsely populated site, but you never said anything about "meaning few posters". Since you singled out ONE particular poster at the "sparsely populated" site.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-6113316140699995672013-04-27T23:54:05.051-04:002013-04-27T23:54:05.051-04:00"... I was? Bring full citation of that (prov..."... I was? Bring full citation of that (prove what you claim)."<br /><br />I posted the link above, with your quote. Here it is again:http://eddiecabot.blogspot.com/2013/02/republicans-are-scum.html?showComment=1364385067861#c6091170083564131495<br />"... You shouldn't be using government equipment to do personal business then. That is called "ILLEGAL" in the US for government employees to use government equipment for personal business."<br /><br />Here's how it went;<br />Me:"This computer is difficult to edit with."<br />You:"... You shouldn't be using government equipment to do personal business then. That is called "ILLEGAL" in the US for government employees to use government equipment for personal business."<br />Me:"Apparently you aren't familiar with the acronym "MWR"."<br />You:"Ahh, so it's GOOD for morale when you government employees steal from the government? Times (and morals) sure have changed since I was in the Army."<br /><br />I eagerly await your semantic contortions to explain how you were talking about something other than posting on this site.<br /><br />"... You are claiming you commit no crimes. There is only one person I know of who can also make that claim."<br /><br />I haven't violated UCMJ. There are other laws, you know. And besides that, some people really just don't commit any crimes. Do you really want to argue otherwise?<br /><br />"Claiming you never "have" violated a very thick book of rules and regulations, is very close to saying you never "could". One leads to the other."<br /><br />No, it doesn't. You can't justify that claim.<br /><br />".... Hmm, you singled one person out by name. Do all posters have the same name?"<br /><br />I said it was a sparsely-populated site. Meaning few posters. The contrast to your "visitors" figure is the number of posters, not you specifically. You are, as you are so very often, wildly confused.Brabantiohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02183512606468901460noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-34132588937306673042013-04-27T08:42:36.098-04:002013-04-27T08:42:36.098-04:00"You were referring to posting on this site.&..."You were referring to posting on this site." ... I was? Bring full citation of that (prove what you claim).<br /><br />"So everyone who doesn't violate UCMJ is the equivalent of Jesus?" ... You are claiming you commit no crimes. There is only one person I know of who can also make that claim.<br /><br />"I love how you demand clarification of something that I never even came close to saying." ... Claiming you never "have" violated a very thick book of rules and regulations, is very close to saying you never "could". One leads to the other. <br /><br />"I'm not talking about "one person", " .... Hmm, you singled one person out by name. Do all posters have the same name?<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7342454496014200176.post-10285720784315851772013-04-24T22:44:48.154-04:002013-04-24T22:44:48.154-04:00I'll clarify that "absolutely right"...I'll clarify that "absolutely right". I'm not talking about "one person", I'm talking about the number of posters. I'm not sure where you got "one person" from that, but on first reading I sort of glazed over that while laughing at your admission of making the "apples/oranges" comparison.Brabantiohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02183512606468901460noreply@blogger.com