SO, I've made the case several times that open-carry is a Whites-only privilege, and that the cops treat whites and blacks dramatically differently in the same situation.
Well, here you go:
Tell me again how racism is dead? How the police don't have a racial bias? Tell me why one man's rights are protected while several of the other's are violated.
Simple answer: If you cannot give a Right to everyone equally, then no one should be given that Right.
Racism will never be dead in America as long as groups like "the nation of islam" and the "kkk" to exist because of "freedom" And you are completely delusional if you think members of both groups aren't part of a police force somewhere.
ReplyDeleteBut it's cute how you only point out one version of racism and not the other as they occur. Nothing hypocritical there, huh?
Are you saying that the 'nation of islam' isn't a racist organization? It sounds like you are saying that.
ReplyDeleteWhat do you propose, a police state that prevents people from forming certain groups? By what standards would that be enforced, exactly?
ReplyDeleteI'm saying that the group is not really relevant because there is no history of its members infiltrating the police force and using that authority as a shield while mistreating white people. There is no history of whites being systematically oppressed AT ALL in this country, so the whole reverse-racism argument is kind of a moot point. Racism isnt just about feeling a certain way based on skin color. It requires a power structure where by one group is being systematically exploited or suppressed over it. If blacks hate whites because of said structure, that's not the same as whites having created said structure in the first place. Absent slavery, Jim crow, lynchings, segregation, work-permits, property seizure, redlining, and countless other forms of discrimination and disenfranchisement, there's little reason to think that blacks would still feel thecsame way about whites. The KKK long preexists the NoI.
ReplyDeleteSays the guy who thinks drunk drivers aren't a danger to the public.
ReplyDeleteExcept I didn't say that, of course. Why can't you answer the question?
ReplyDeleteKnock if off you two. And answer the question, William. Its a valid query.
ReplyDeleteKnock if off you two. And answer the question, William. It's a valid query.
ReplyDeleteAll I did was ask a valid question, Eddie.
ReplyDeleteWere done here. I said no such thing and I'm not going to argue with you over this. Our points will stand as they are.
ReplyDeleteOf course you're not going to argue. You always quit when your hypocritical stances are exposed. Nothing new under the sun.
ReplyDeleteI said we're done. Don't try my patients. The points are there for people to read and decide for themselves. If youve fone ss you claim, then no further discussion is needed.
ReplyDeleteI don't propose anything. I'm just stating FACTS. Ever think of giving that a try? Why do I have to "propose" anything when I simply point out the facts as they are? His "query" is stupid and another method of his to avoid what is being discussed. So YOU knock it off, Ed. If you're going to run away after the facts are brought out, then why should I worry about answering anything brought by hypocritical liberals?
ReplyDeleteYou're points are there. Why are you threatening others when they bring different points related to THIS subject?
ReplyDeleteYes, you did. But I'm not going to have this devolve into the usual nonsense. This is how it startsstarts. Im stoping it here.
ReplyDeleteNow, William, please answer the question.
If you're going to complain about groups forming, then you must have some alternative to that in mind. Otherwise, what's your point? What "facts" are you presenting?
ReplyDeleteThe facts I'm presenting are that there are racists from both sides present in the police forces of this nation.
ReplyDeleteI'm fine with you maintaining a standard of behavior, since that will only hurt William.
ReplyDeleteThe facts have been stated and s valid question asked about what you would do about the situation. If that answer is "nothing," say so and get on with your life.
ReplyDeleteI asked you about your comment about "freedom" and hate groups.
ReplyDeleteSays the guy who thinks drunk drivers aren't a danger to the public until they get arrested.
ReplyDeleteAgain, I never said that. Try to stay on topic.
ReplyDeleteLast warning.
ReplyDeleteWhat facts have been stated? YOUR facts? Or REAL facts?
ReplyDeleteWell, then. Talk about the topic and stop asking stupid questions about what I propose.
ReplyDeleteI asked you about your comment. If your comment wasn't on topic, that's your fault.
ReplyDeleteAll of us have made our points, and stated the situation as we see it. And replied to each other. People can read anfmake their own call. This will not devolve into I said/you said.
ReplyDeleteI'm not going to say this again.
Warn all you want, Ed. I expect you to kick out opposing voices. Since you can't handle anyone opposing your position.
ReplyDeleteYou asked an irrelevant question about my statement. That's YOUR fault.
ReplyDeleteI said we're done.
ReplyDeleteYou would have to show how it was irrelevant, which you haven't attempted to do.
ReplyDeleteLet it go. He's blocked now. Maybe the next right winger that comes by will be able to engage in the intellectual process of argument. But these sections are for everyone to read and commen in and 600 posts of you and asshat over there going back and forth makes anyone else tring to join in geel like its futile. I'm sick of it, so problem solved. For the record, you were never the problem here, but it had to end. So I've ended it.
ReplyDelete