Rand Paul Says He Didn't Think Obama's Views 'Could Get Any Gayer'
And I didn't think Rand Paul's views on anything could get any stupider.
Two things... President Obama finally coming out an saying he's OK with Gay marriage? Is really the first INKLING in his entire Presidency that he's show ANY evidence of having any balls at all. (And seeing as how he's the last person in his administration to 'come out' so to speak, it's pretty scant even so.) But hey: It's the RIGHT position, it's common sense, it's American, and it's about damned time. Good on you, Barry!
As for the Right Honorable Redneck from Kentucky? Um... using "gay" as a pejorative...
(1) Stopped being funny after the 3rd grade. So grow up.
(2) Is bigoted and homophobic
You wouldn't say Obama's views couldn't get any blacker, would you?
Well, OK, YOU might...
But I wouldn't say, "And just when I though Justice Scalia's view couldn't get anymore Sicilian..."
Because there is no reason that 'Sicilian' can be used in that context and it NOT be racist. Likewise, there is no context to use "gay" as a pejorative that isn't hurtful, and that doesn't encourage the continued mistreatment of so many freedom loving Americans.
So... FUCK YOU, YOU HOPELESSLY WITLESS SCUMBAG.
And reading over your budget, man... I didn't think I'd ever see something so Kentucky in my entire life.
(How do you like it, you fucking inbreed?)
Who IS this guy?!
Political Talk Show Host and Internet Radio Personality. My show, In My Humble Opinion, aired on RainbowRadio from 2015-2017, and has returned for 2021! Feel free to contact me at niceguy9418@usa.com. You can also friend me on Facebook.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The only "balls" Obama is showing are the ones that express his desire and absolute NEED to garner as many votes as possible in the next election. He couldn't win the last election without promising to pay the voters (and that was against pitiful competition such as Sarah Palin and some old guy). Now, the competition is even less advanced so Obama goes against his religious beliefs to appease the major voting block of the liberal party ... just to get votes. Yeah that sure is some guy you support there. He will dump his moral standards just to get votes.
ReplyDeleteObama's stance on gay marriage is one of absolute hypocrisy. He says "personally" he supports gay marriage, but WHAT has he done to get gay marriage laws forced into the state laws? Since NO state has voted to approve gay marriage, there must be something Obama has done to show his full professional support for that issue. Oh, darn ... he's still against gay "marriage" rights within legal constraints. He still prefers 'civil unions' ... as does almost every other person who is against gay "marriage" but feel rights are deserved (including myself).
"(How do you like it, you fucking inbreed?)"
Really? And this is during an article that you're whining about Paul making stupid statements and calling him a bigot?
Eddie;
ReplyDeleteI would disagree with the "showing balls" on this issue statement. Getting rid of DADT, and putting an end to the Justice Department's defense of DOMA were examples of having pelotas, IMHP. The President's statements have now caught up with his policy.
William: Your 'buying the election' fantasy is no less idiotic now than when you first threw it out there. As for what Obama has done to show his "full professional (professional? WTF does that mean in this context?) support", look at at the above paragraph.
"William: Your 'buying the election' fantasy is no less idiotic now than when you first threw it out there."
ReplyDeleteI can't believe you are so blind as to deny that's what he did to get elected. Well, yes, I can believe that. In the links I provide, tell me what does #1 mean when it says: "1. Forcing big oil companies to take a reasonable share of their record breaking windfall profits and use it to help struggling families with direct relief worth $500 for an individual and $1,000 for a married couple. THE RELIEF WOULD BE DELIVERED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE to help families cope with the rising price of gasoline, food and other necessities. The rebates would be fully paid for with five years of a windfall profits tax on record oil company profits. This relief would be a down payment on Obama’s long-term plan to provide middle-class families with at least $1000 per year in permanent tax relief." (highlites mine)
http://www.politico.com/static/PPM41_emergencyeconplan.html
And, in case you don't believe the 'politico' version of the Obama plan, here's Obama's version:
http://obama.3cdn.net/0035b25f3b7e0a7fe3_w0kdmvrq8.pdf
"(professional? WTF does that mean in this context?)"
It must be true that you have no ability to comprehend the written english language. It means (in context) that he felt it was his "job" to say gays get equal rights, but "personally" he has gone on record as saying he favors "civil union" rights over "marriage" rights. The reasoning behind that is that he is a CHRISTIAN. And, being a Christian he knows that God says homosexuality is a sin and therefore Obama cannot personally support a sin that his God does not approve of. However, as President, he cannot use religion (so you left-wingers claim) to make policy decisions, so he supports gays "professionally" and does not "personally". Do I need to explain this again, or do you understand it this time?
Here's a good article I'm sure none of you have read. It is about how being gay is in no way related to being a pedophile. And to think he championed for "human rights". I wonder if he is related to Jerry Sandusky or if they share stories about their escapades over the internet.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.sfexaminer.com/local/crime/2012/06/child-porn-arrest-gay-rights-activist-stuns-san-francisco