Who IS this guy?!

'Niceguy' Eddie

Political Talk Show Host and Internet Radio Personality. My show, In My Humble Opinion, aired on RainbowRadio from 2015-2017.

Feel free to contact me at niceguy9418@usa.com. You can also friend me on Facebook, follow me on Twitter, and Tumblr, and support my Patreon. Also, if you don't mind the stench, you can find my unofficial "fan club" over HERE. ;)


Monday, October 11, 2010

Symbols... for the symbolminded?

I’m not really all that big on SYMBOLS. I’m not a religious man, as you know, so there’s no symbol I really see as sacred. Even FLAG BURNING is hard for me to get all that worked up about. Some are cool, and some are important, but the whole idea that there are man-made symbols that are so pure (or so evil, such as the swastika) that they simply cannot be disrespected (or used) in any way shape or form…? That to me is completely irrational. In fact, I’ll go so far as to say it is this very irrationality that gives these symbols their power. If people weren’t so wound up about the Swasticka? Far fewer people would ever use them. (And those that still would, obviously, have their own problems.) Same goes for flag burning – if we weren’t so worked about it, most people wouldn’t bother DOING it. (And again… those that would have their own problems.) But these things are being done specifically because it pisses ordinary people off! And OK, it riles up the real crazies as well - nazi's terroists - but you can't do much about THAT anyway and it's hardly a reason to play ball.  The very fact that we would even TALK about banning it as a form of Constitutional protection is evidence of the kind of irrational thinking, is exactly what GIVES the act it power!

Now, as I said, I don’t think that way. Shwasticka wearers, flag burners… I’m inclined to just shake my head and get on with my life. They're morons, biggots, idiots... that's fine, I'll have all the same problems with the PEOPLE that I would have anyway, but... the symbols themselves just aren’t all that important to me. Just makes it easy to identify the ignorant, I always say. (Though I still appreciate the symbolism of that Taliban motherfucker who tried to burn the American Flag and ended up lighting himself on fire in the process! LOL. I’m not completely heartless (or without a sense of humor) you know!)

But, in any case, for better of worse symbols are powerful. You can’t argue that. And with that in mind, I think it’s high time that LIBERALS pick a new symbol. The Jackass? Yeah… way too easy to work into jokes.  Fine for the Democrats. At this point they've got it coming anyway.  But LIBERALS need something to differentiate themselves from DEMOCRATS and to dispel this absurd myth the Right keeps yappign about how the LEFT who hates their country.  (Actually, it's the RIGHT that hate their country. But that's neither here there there right now.)

And if you're down with what I’m getting at, you'll realize that the symbol of Conservatives is NOT the Elephant. THAT'S the symbol for Republicans.  CONSERVATIVES have coopted adopted another one: The BALD EAGLE. Think about it. Now, I realize that the Bald Eagle is actully an AMERICAN Symbol, fine.  But if you see one at the top of a website? You pretty much KNOW it’s a Right Wing site, correct? Seriously. Almost every one I've ever seen! (And yet NEVER of a Liberal'ssite.) They LOVE that symbol! And whenever they are trying to make a SERIOUS symbolic point, they never use the Elephant. They use the BALD EAGLE.

And really? It’s perfect for them. Predetory. Thieving. A species that’s been around for thousands of years, but almost went extinct before 1980. It’s a good fit. And they’ve pretty much monopoliozed it, so there’s really no point in trying to get it back.  (And I don't really want it anyway.  I see no way in which it represents Liberalism.)

So let’s play their game for a moment. Think of another symbol that’s undeniabley American, completely patriotic, bordering even on sacred, that the Liberals could adopt that would be a good fit with our movement, show our patriotism, be unassaible from a “pro-american” point of view and also be something that the Republicans and Conservtaioves wouldn’t even really want to try and take back from us (even is they wouldn’t dream of denigrating it.) I’ve been thinking about that, and I think I have the answer:

The Statue of Liberty.

Now… there is a LITTLE BIT of tongue-in-cheek here, but in even in all seriousness, it really is pretty much a perfect fit.

The statue is of a woman. A POWERFUL woman. This shows our commitment to gender equality and feminism. (Palin, Bachman, Angle & company, along with Steele only show the Right’s commitment to tokenism. Well... And that precious few women of any real talent would (or should) be Conservative.)

She welcomed immigrants to this country.  And let's face it, the people who are trying to kick out the Mexicans and build a 50 foot high electric fence, topped iwth barbed wire and patrolled by rabid pitbulls to KEEP them out sure as hell aren't Liberals

Think of her most famous inscription: Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free. (Thanks Erin, I hadn't realized how apt that was until I read your strip.)  The Right certainly has no claim to the poor. OK… they have their VOTE at the moment, at least the WHITE poor, but that comes down to MAKRTETING, not any real policy or empathy. And really, more and more, the Republican Party has nothing at all to offer to anyone “yearning to breathe free.” Sure they TALK a good game, but it’s all down to marketing. No Abortion. No Gay Marriage. No Sex. No Drugs. No free exchange of information. No Health Care. No free speech. No freedom from discrimination. No freedom from religion, despite a constitutional mandate for it. The list goes on and on.

The only freedoms the Right stands for are for Corporations to be free from any Government regulation, the Rich to be free of any taxation and for the Church to oppress all those who disagree with them, and proselytize without moderation, from a postion of legal authority. (Again, despite a Constitutional mandate that this NOT HAPPEN.) They only want any real freedom for those whose power is so great that they can pretty much do as they wish anyway. If there was every a party that stood up for the “huddled masses yearning to breathe free,” it has been the Democrats for the past 75 to 100 years. (And the Progressive Republicans, but let’s face it: those guys have been the victims of systematic political genocide over the past three decades.)

She bears a torch. That's another powerfully apt symbol.  When a Liberal bears a torch, it is symbolic of a beacon, meant to lead people out of darkness. And if the Right tried to co-opt THAT, the obvious joke is that they needed to get a torch because they’re going BACK INTO the darkness.

She was a gift from another country, which represents the sprit of international diplomacy and peace.
Finally, along those same lines… she’s French. So even if this Liberal branding was wildly successful, they’d have to get over their Francophobia before they could seriously try to reclaim it.

LOL (I said some of it was tongue-in cheeck, didn't I?) But still.

Finally, think of the organizations that have already worked her into their logos: The ACLU comes to mind.

One final thought… The obvious political cartoon of the future might have a Bald Eagle shitting on the Statue of Liberty. Now I’d have no doubt that even after all the tears they shed over burnt flags, they’d have no problem joking about the desecration of an American Symbol that represented the Left. Hypocrisy thy name is Republicans, after all. But the cartoon would backfire somewhat because of the perhaps unintentional symbolism there in: First, that the Republicans aren’t really capable of doing anything except shitting all over everything. That’s pretty much where they are as a party. It’s working for them, but still… THAT’S REALLY ALL THEY’RE DOING, right? Second, that, try as they might, all the RW Eagle-Shit in the world cannot move, bury, or destroy the statue. And no amount of RW shit-slinging will dissuade us from our path. Because the path of Liberalism is right. The path of Progressivism is GOOD. And for ME, there is no greater, more apt symbol of the kind of freedom that is represented by what is so derisively referred to by these RW hypocrites as “the Left.” THAT is the only REAL freedom. The only freedom that REALLY allows all human beings the rights that were promised them. And for my part, I would rather allow a million people to make (what I may believe to be) bad decisions affecting only themselves, than to stand in the way of even a single person’s pursuit of happiness. THAT is freedom. And THAT is what I see in this Iconic, Patriotic, All-American Symbol.

Now… if only I ever saw any evidence of that in AMERICA.

THIS is Liberalism.

And we should stake our claim to this, the same way the Right did with the Bald Eagle.  If you're with me, make sure to add a picture of Lady Liberty to you blog or website, assuming you don't have her on there yet.  Not because we need to get all weepy over symbols like they do... Just because it'll PISS THEM OFF.  (And do so while representing our values in many way.)


  1. I think it is so weird that rightists chose a protected endangered species as their symbol.

  2. LOL - And it's pretty much the only endangered species they've ever shown any interest in saving.


    "Not usually, but-"

    "NO? OKAY DIG."

    "-but the polar bears and the seals and all of the ocean creatures... what about them?"


  4. Whoops. My conservative impersonation is terrible... I forgot to mention that God loves bald eagles and wants liberals to die, and something about my invalid assumption that if Jesus existed he was a good looking white man. Silly me.

    Really though, I like your idea. It makes a whole lot of sense. I'd say our symbol should be a photograph of the FUCKING CONSTITUTION but I don't think that'd be left alone by the media for more than a half nanosecond.

  5. MetalMatt,

    "Not usually, but-"
    "NO? OKAY DIG."

    That's friggin' beautiful! I love it!

    And I actualy thought about using the Constitution is some way... You know maybe as a counter-balance to them using the FLAG. Because I'll take the Constitution over the Flag ANY day. And no serious political anal;ysts can look at the Constitution, and conlcude that it is anything but a Liberal document. And that's looking at it NOW. Back THEN? It was a FALMINGLY Liberal Document. It was a downright treasonous manifesto that men DIED and WERE KILLED by the entrenced powers over. Now THAT'S a Liberal Document if ever there was one!

    But I don't really want to use that because as POWERFUL as symbols are, it is only our foibles as human beings that give them power. So to make the Constitution into a symbol? A Logo? Actualy just diminshes its importance. The Bald Eagle, the Statue of Liberty, the Flag... These are ALREADY just symbols. But the Constitution is MORE than that. It's value is legal and tangible, and it's the wrong message to send to reduce it to just a mere symbol.

    Plus... if it really were no more than a Symbol of Liberalism, the Right Wing would only be that much more brazen in their attempts to modify, ammend or just outright ignore and violate it.

    I like the way you think though!

    Thanks for your comment.